Russian politician about Russian literature. Putin laugh (Eng. Sub).

Russian politician about Russian literature. Putin laugh (Eng. Sub).


Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!
I listened to everyone who spoke. They all are in favor of culture and stand for the preservation of the Russian language. But when we, in the State Parliament, offered a corresponding bill , personally me, others refused to accept it. That is the position of those, who in this sacred place says “YES”, and then returns to their’s offices and says “NO”. If you do not want their music then make our own!
[Statement to the previous speaker] How long should I talk about this: We borrow hundreds of foreign, inorganic words. It destroys Russian language. Our children do not understand it, they believe indeed, that it is really Russian language. Foreigners conclude, that Russians have no words to express the new terms. This humiliates us. Lets take even your office, Vladimir Vladimirovich Every language has its own term for “President”. Turks has “bashkan”, others have “rais”. Only Russians have no find a proper word for “Ruler of Russia”, or, I do not know,
“Chairman”. In China they have Chairman of Republic. And we have this alien word. Mayor of Moscow. What on Earth the “mayor”, when for thousand of years we had “the Head of the city”. We have to protect our language, othrwise billions of people around the World will be convinced that Russians have no a single their own term. Why “Army”. Why not “Voisko”? Good Russian word. Listen: “Voisko goes”! But no, we use this French word “Army”, “Battalions”. And so forth. Some reminded about emigration of Russians. I would add something. We need to develop proper informational background. Let us show, how bad they love there. [Russians abroad] A story: I had a Manager of Publishing house, my Chief. Karzev his surname is, physician. Let us show, what is he in N.York now. Here he was the manager of the biggest Publishing house of the whole USSR. Here he was the manager of the biggest Publishing house of the whole USSR. What is he THERE? An errand boy. Not even a small adviser or something. We need to show all the shabbiness of their life. I can understand, why did they run. They were afraid, that we will close the borders again. Our task is to explain to our citizens, how unhappy there Russians are, making their living as waiters and taxi drivers. Here someone were Colonel of Army. There he carries Parisian prostitutes. Is this Russian Officer’s attainment? Ah, it was Cold War. Let us talk about Museums. We have got a lot, but we need unique ones. E.g., We have the Tank Museum, but hardly you will get there. The Whole world would love to have a look at it. We gathered the whole Planet’s tanks. Let’s do so everyone could visit it. Museums have to be unique. Now we have local history museums mostly. Theaters. We have got the “Sovremennik” [means: “MODERN”]. But no one modern play is there. Is not it enough? We have or classic, or foreign plays only. For example, we have Gogol’s”Dead souls”. For example, we have Gogol’s”Dead souls”. Have not we got such heroes nowadays, who buy not the dead workers and then sell them as alive, but bankrupt businesses. buy not the dead workers and then sell them as alive, but bankrupt businesses. Then have a loan on securities of these businesses, and transfers the currency offshore then. Then have a loan on securities of these businesses, and transfers the currency offshore then. I just gave you a plot of the story for free right now. Who will be such new author who will write new :”Dead souls”? Or, another example. “Woe from Wit”. Modernize it! It has Chatski [intellectual and romantic]. We have no them nowadays. Only Sophie. and we have Molchalin. [Stupid but wealthy] Who is Molchalin? He is an official. Why Sophie chooses him, not clever Chatski? Who is Molchalin? He is a dull official. Why Sophie chooses him, not clever Chatski? Because he has constant income, he is an official. He is a corrupted one. Because he has constant income, he is an official. He is a corrupted one. Have not we got the same stories nowadays? Have not we got those who suffered this Woe from Wit? Have not we got the same stories nowadays? Have not we got those who suffered this Woe from Wit? Or Turgenev. Interpretation of his “Mu-Mu” is still wrong. I asked our youth, our schoolkids, “Who is the main hero of “Mu-Mu” of Turgenev? They say: “The god”. I asked our youth, our schoolkids, “Who is the main hero of “Mu-Mu” of Turgenev? They say: “The god”. How the puppy can be the main hero?? Who is an example to copy. The deaf Gerasimus? Is he a hero? No. The Old landy is. Turgenev wrote this story about her. She is his mother, she lived here, nearby, on Prechistenka st. He loved his mother. But millions of schoolchildren believe, that the hero is the dog, or even the deaf-mute yardman. We need to modernize it. Show this madam. Who is she nowadays? Probably, Vasilieva, who held in the corruption case. [Famous corrupted official of Defense ministry, woman] Probably, Vasilieva, who held in the corruption case. [Famous corrupted official of Defense ministry, woman] And the deaf Gerasimus… Some migrant from Central Asia could be taken as an example. And also Mu-Mu. And the deaf Gerasimus… Some migrant from Central Asia could be taken as an example. And also Mu-Mu. Such a modern play will arouse interest, because we have nothing modern nowadays. Such a modern play will arouse interest, because we have nothing modern nowadays. Why Dosloevski became the great writer? 10 years of hard labours. Why Dosloevski became the great writer? 10 years of hard labours. Conclusion? We need to put people in prisons. 3, 4, 5 years in prisons and voila, new Dostoevski right there. And new Tchaikovski also. Or Mayakovski.We have Vishnevski, the poet, but he write nothing but some jokes, couplet, rhymes. Young people requires big name. Where is he? Where is Rubtsov? Where is Esenin? No one real poet. History of Art and high culture was built by prisons and sexual minorities. History of Art and high cultire was built by prisons and sexual minorities. We do not use neither first, not second. So we have no one great artist. We do not use neither first, not second. So we have no one great artist. A fatty butch, who sits in a classy Moscow apartment will not create any great piece of art. Masterpiece needs an impulse. A fatty butch, who sits in a classy Moscow apartment will not create any great piece of art. Masterpiece needs an impulse. A freak will create, yes! Those who became freaks in prisons, or by some psychic reasons, will create. Those who became freaks in prisons, or by some psychic reasons, will do. People need a name, what would inflame their hearts. Who inflames nowadays? What we have is the funeral house, full of the dead writers, composers, poets. Modern are required! What we have is the funeral house, full of the dead writers, composers, poets. Modern are required! We erect monuments to them, and the whole country seems like a graveyard. We erect monuments to them, and the whole country seems like a graveyard. And young people need inspiration. They need something new, a example. And young people need inspiration. They need something new, a example. That is why it is so hard to learn this 19th or 18th century’s literature. We need to modernize it. It is my critic to our humanitarian ministries. Livanov and Medinski work well, but they are missing such an approach, which would make the Russian literature’s st. book sought-after to take in hands. Livanov and Medinski work well, but they are missing such an approach, which would make the Russian literature’s st. book sought-after to take in hands. The last example for today. About inflections. The minimum for passing Russian language test has been downed again. It was too few when there was 36 points, and NOW there is enough 24 points. In Soviet time it was “BAD”. The “BAD” mark allows them to study further (In colleges and Universities). The “BAD” mark allows them to study further (In colleges and Universities). I can not forget for 50 years already, how my MSU Russian language professor, to flunk me, tortured me. I can not forget for 50 years already, how my MSU Russian language professor, to flunk me, tortured me. I already nearly passed the exam. And then he asked me the part of speech, which are written with “-“. I already nearly passed the exam. And then he asked me the part of speech, which are written with “-“. “koe”, “to”, “libo”, “nibud'”, “taki”. That professor, to flunk me, asked: “Which one can be used in text independently”. That professor, to flunk me, asked: “Which one can be used in text independently”. I wonder if you all here, who are clothed authority, know it. I wonder if you all here, who are clothed authority, know it. Why had I know it at my 18? It was such a skewness thereat. Why had I know it at my 18? It was such a skewness thereat. Answer: “KOE”. Pushkin used it in one of his works. WHY should a young student from a province to know it? It was such a skewness in the USSR times. Too much questions. But now no questions at all! Losers got their certificates and go to study further. It is the problem. Losers got their certificates and go to study further. It is the problem. We have the greatest, the most admirable culture, but we need support those deputies who offer new bills which will protect our literature and language. but we need support those deputies who offer new bills which will protect our literature and language. I have ended. Vladimir Zhirinovski speech was colourful. as usual. I read it. Thank you very much. You gave me this brochure:”How to speak Russian properly” I read it. Thank you very much. You gave me this brochure:”How to speak Russian properly” I support that you said to me. Indeed, we need to avoid extra latinisation of our language. I support that you said to me. Indeed, we need to avoid extra latinisation of our language. I refer to our region’s heads now. When I come to a city, I see the level of local official’s culture. When I come to a city, I see the level of local official’s culture. If on every corner these is various banners written with Latin letters exclusively, it makes me doubt, what country we are living in. If on every corner these is various banners performed with Latin letters exclusively, it makes me doubt, what country we are living in. Everything is well moderately, is not it? As well as in usage of various terms and words and so on. As well as in usage of various terms and words and so on. Here you offer to us to replace the word “genius” by the word “talant”. But, is not it the same thing? We need to ask it from our Russian language experts, though We need to ask it from our Russian language experts, though And, the word “talant” is perhaps from the New Testament, is not it? Is not it derived from one of semitic languages? Is not it derived from one of semitic languages? Because “talant” was the name of a coin and the wight measure as well. And, since it is from the New Testament, is not this word derived from semitic languages? And, since it is from the New Testament, is not this word derived semitic languages? It is not our word definetely too. Also, we could change “metro” (subway) and say “under ground transport”. But, e.g. French people also do not change Russian word “bistro” into “cafe”. There are such a settled things. But I also believe that Vladimir Volfovich is correct in many ways, and we need to take it seriously and attentively. There are such a settled things. But I also believe that Vladimir Volfovich is correct in many ways, and we need to take it seriously and attentively. There are such a settled things. But I also believe that Vladimir Volfovich is correct in many ways, and we need to take it seriously and attentively. Our workers of culture should take it seriously also, and Vladimir Volfovich told us about it also. Our workers of culture should take it seriously also, and Vladimir Volfovich told us about it also. Our workers of culture should take it seriously also, and Vladimir Volfovich told us about it also. Should not you refer to people’s hearts more, not only earn money?

local_offerevent_note October 12, 2019

account_box Matthew Anderson


local_offer

One thought on “Russian politician about Russian literature. Putin laugh (Eng. Sub).”

  • Ржут… Они ржут… Сытые рожи.
    А Путин, хоть и тоже улыбался, но высказался достаточно разумно относительно того, что было сказано Жириновским.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *